International comparisons of mathematics classrooms and curricula: the validity-comparability compromise
Clarke, David, Wang, Lidong, Xu, Lihua, Aizikovitsh-Udi, Einav and Cao, Yiming 2012, International comparisons of mathematics classrooms and curricula: the validity-comparability compromise, in PME 36 : Opportunities to Learn in Mathematics Education : Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 2012, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 171-178.
PME 36 : Opportunities to Learn in Mathematics Education : Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 2012
Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
Start page
171
End page
178
Total pages
8
Publisher
National Taiwan Normal University
Place of publication
Taipei, Taiwan
Summary
The pursuit of commensurability in international comparative research by imposing general classificatory frameworks can misrepresent valued performances, school knowledge and classroom practice as these are actually conceived by each community and sacrifice validity in the interest of comparability. The “validity-comparability compromise” is proposed as a theoretical concern with significant implications for international cross-cultural research. We draw on current international research to illustrate a variety of aspects of the issue and its consequences for the manner in which international research is conducted and its results interpreted. The effects extend to data generation and analysis and constitute essential contingencies on the interpretation and application of international comparative research.
ISSN
0771-100X
Language
eng
Field of Research
130208 Mathematics and Numeracy Curriculum and Pedagogy
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO.
If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.