A decade of change in Australia’s DBA landscape

Wallace,M, Byrne,C, Vocino,A, Sloan,T, Pervan,S and Blackman,D 2015, A decade of change in Australia’s DBA landscape, Education + training, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 31-47, doi: 10.1108/ET-07-2013-0096.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title A decade of change in Australia’s DBA landscape
Author(s) Wallace,M
Vocino,AORCID iD for Vocino,A orcid.org/0000-0002-5551-9059
Journal name Education + training
Volume number 57
Issue number 1
Start page 31
End page 47
Publisher Emerald Group Publishing
Place of publication Bingley, England
Publication date 2015
ISSN 0040-0912
Keyword(s) Australia
Doctorate in business administration
Professional doctorate
Quality control
Research standards
Research supervision
Summary Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the dynamics of the Doctorate of Business Administration (DBA) in Australia through the lens of a changing higher education landscape. The paper reflects on issues raised in a previous analysis of DBA programmes undertaken a decade ago, and highlights persistent challenges and emerging opportunities for professional Doctorate programmes in the Australian context.Design/methodology/approach – Interviews were undertaken with higher degree research directors, deans of graduate schools, and DBA programme directors from all 18 Australian institutions offering the DBA in 2013. Quantitative data on enrolments, accreditation requirements, course structures; and demographics are contextualised within a qualitative view of programme purposes, student and institutional motivations, rationales and concerns. Particular focus is given to perceptions of the difference between traditional research doctorates (PhDs) and professional doctorates, especially the DBA.Findings – In the decade from 2003 to 2013 DBA enrolments are down but enquiries are up, indicating unmet demand. There is a shift in the players, with some smaller, regional universities dramatically increasing their enrolments, and larger, traditional institutions exiting the space altogether. Significant changes in accreditation criteria have generated a perceptual shift: where DBAs previously suffered from “academic snobbery” regarding their legitimacy, this perception is being challenged by standards which require DBA equivalence with a PhD. This shift in standards has also created some confusion amongst supervisors and candidates.Originality/value – There is limited research into the DBA award or its candidates, and academic literature is generally silent on DBA supervision. This piece of research, one of very few that specifically examine the DBA, reflects on the past decade, analyses the present context and identifies emerging issues for the delivery of DBA programmes in Australia.
Language eng
DOI 10.1108/ET-07-2013-0096
Field of Research 150399 Business and Management not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 939999 Education and Training not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2015, Emerald Group Publishing
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30069569

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 6 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 493 Abstract Views, 10 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 04 Mar 2015, 14:13:48 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.