The development and validation of a golf swing and putt skill assessment for children Barnett, Lisa M., Hardy, Louise L., Brian, Ali S. and Robertson, Sam 2015, The development and validation of a golf swing and putt skill assessment for children, Journal of sports science and medicine, vol. 14, pp. 147-154. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads SYMPLECTIC-LICENCE DRO_Licence_Agreement.txt 1.48KB 70 barnett-developmentvalidgolfswing-2015.pdf Published version application/pdf 216.89KB 61 Title The development and validation of a golf swing and putt skill assessment for children Author(s) Barnett, Lisa M. orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-625X Hardy, Louise L. Brian, Ali S. Robertson, Sam Journal name Journal of sports science and medicine Volume number 14 Start page 147 End page 154 Total pages 8 Publisher Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Place of publication Bursa, Turkey Publication date 2015 ISSN 1303-2968 Keyword(s) movement skill object control golf Summary The aim was to describe development of a process-oriented instrument designed to assess the golf swing and putt stroke, and to assess the instrument’s discriminative validity in terms of age and reliability (intra-rater and re-test). A Delphi consultation (with golf industry professionals and researchers in movement skill assessment) was used to develop an assessment for each skill based on existing skill assessment protocols. Each skill had six components to be marked as present/absent. Individual scores were based on the number of performance components successfully demonstrated over two trials for each skill (poten-tial score range 0 to 24). Children (n = 43) aged 6-10 years (M = 7.8 years, SD = 1.3) were assessed in both skills live in the field by one rater at Time 1(T1). A subset of children (n = 28) had consent for assessments to be videoed. Six weeks later 19 chil-dren were reassessed, five days apart (T2, T3). An ANOVA assessed discriminative validity i.e. whether skill competence at T1 differed by age (6 years, 7/8 years and 9/10 years). Intraclass correlations (ICC) assessed intra-rater reliability between the live and video assessment at T1 and test-retest reliability (be-tween T2 and T3). Paired t-tests assessed any systematic differ-ences between live and video assessments (T1) and between T2 and T3. Older children were more skilled (F (2, 40) = 11.18, p < 0.001). The live assessment reflected the video assessment (ICC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.59, 0.90) and scores did not differ between live and video assessments. Test retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.60, 95% CI 0.23, 0.82), although the mean score was slightly higher at retest. This instrument could be used reliably by golf coaches and physical education teachers as part of sys-tematic early player assessment and feedback. Language eng Field of Research 110603 Motor Control 1106 Human Movement And Sports Science 0913 Mechanical Engineering Socio Economic Objective 970111 Expanding Knowledge in the Medical and Health Sciences HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal ERA Research output type C Journal article Copyright notice ©2014, Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Free to Read? Yes Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30077916 Document type: Journal Article Collections: Faculty of Health School of Health and Social Development Open Access Collection Related Links Link Description Connect to published version Go to link with your DU access privileges   Connect to published version Go to link with your DU access privileges     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au. Versions Version Filter Type Fri, 04 Sep 2015, 14:15:41 EST Sat, 05 Sep 2015, 05:01:49 EST Mon, 07 Sep 2015, 08:38:33 EST Mon, 07 Sep 2015, 10:29:06 EST Tue, 01 Dec 2015, 14:25:27 EST Mon, 18 Jan 2016, 07:28:31 EST Wed, 03 Feb 2016, 05:08:55 EST Wed, 31 Aug 2016, 10:45:01 EST Wed, 31 Aug 2016, 11:03:28 EST Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 02:27:19 EST Wed, 06 Dec 2017, 10:43:44 EST Fri, 07 Sep 2018, 17:52:42 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 12 times in TR Web of Science Cited 15 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 541 Abstract Views, 132 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Tue, 01 Dec 2015, 14:25:27 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.