The use of mixed methods in drug discovery: integrating qualitative methods into clinical trials
Berk, Michael, Otmar, Renee, Dean, Olivia, Berk, Lesley and Michalak, Erin 2015, The use of mixed methods in drug discovery: integrating qualitative methods into clinical trials. In Tohen, Mauricio, Bowden, Charles L., Nierenberg, Andrew A. and Geddes, John R. (ed), Clinical trial design challenges in mood disorders, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp.59-73, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-405170-6.00006-3.
Attached Files
Name
Description
MIMEType
Size
Downloads
Title
The use of mixed methods in drug discovery: integrating qualitative methods into clinical trials
Contemporary methods in clinical trials are pivoted around hypothesis confirmation, not generation. This is a problem for new drug discovery, since the pharmacokinetic or receptor profile of most novel agents do not link to pathophysiology, which is very poorly understood. Therefore, it is difficult to impute the therapeutic potential of a candidate agent. Most psychotropic agents were discovered serendipitously, either through careful clinical observation or by researchers finding unexpected associations in datasets. Methods that increase the ability to detect latent signals in data are needed. These include mixed methods that incorporate qualitative methods into randomized controlled trials.
This chapter proposes a methodology for the integration of mixed methods in clinical trials, fusing qualitative and quantitative methods, and presents an exemplar using this approach.
Mixed methods show potential for signal detection, hypothesis generation, and associations that may be otherwise undetected in traditional clinical trials.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.