•  Home
  • Library
  • DRO home
Submit research Contact DRO

DRO

Openly accessible

Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer at

Luckett, Tim, Phillips, Jane, Agar, Meera, Lam, Lawrence, Davidson, Patricia M, McCaffrey, Nicola, Boyle, Frances, Shaw, Tim, Currow, David C, Read, Alison, Hosie, Annmarie and Lovell, Melanie 2018, Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial, BMC health services research, vol. 18, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3318-0.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
mccaffrey-protocolfora-2018.pdf Published version application/pdf 1.30MB 82

Title Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial
Author(s) Luckett, Tim
Phillips, Jane
Agar, Meera
Lam, Lawrence
Davidson, Patricia M
McCaffrey, NicolaORCID iD for McCaffrey, Nicola orcid.org/0000-0003-3684-3723
Boyle, Frances
Shaw, Tim
Currow, David C
Read, Alison
Hosie, Annmarie
Lovell, Melanie
Journal name BMC health services research
Volume number 18
Article ID 558
Start page 1
End page 13
Total pages 13
Publisher BioMed Central
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2018-07-16
ISSN 1472-6963
Keyword(s) cancer
pain
guidelines
implementation
translation
self-management
patient education
health professional education
audit and feedback
clinical change champions
science & technology
life sciences & biomedicine
health care sciences & services
Summary BACKGROUND: Pain is a common and distressing symptom in people with cancer, but is under-recognised and under-treated. Australian guidelines for 'Cancer Pain Management in Adults' are available on the Cancer Council Australia Cancer Guideline Wiki. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a suite of guideline implementation strategies for improving pain outcomes in adults with cancer in oncology and palliative care outpatient settings.

METHODS: The study will use a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled design, with oncology and palliative care outpatient services as the clusters. Patients will be eligible if they are adults with cancer and pain presenting to participating services during the study period. During an initial control arm, services will routinely screen patients for average and worst pain over the past 24 h using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) and have unfettered access to online guidelines. During the intervention arm, staff at each service will be encouraged to use: 1) a patient education booklet and self-management resource; 2) an online spaced learning cancer pain education module for clinicians from different disciplines; and 3) audit and feedback of service performance on key indices of cancer pain screening, assessment and management. Service-based clinical change champions will lead implementation of these strategies. The trial's primary outcome will be the probability that patients initially screened as having moderate-severe (≥5/10 NRS) worst pain experience a clinically important improvement one week later, defined as  ≥ 30% reduction. Secondary outcomes will include patient empowerment and quality of life, carer experience, and cost-effectiveness. For the main analysis, linear mixed models will be used, accounting for clustering and the longitudinal design. Eighty-two patients per service at six services (N = 492) will provide > 90% power. A qualitative sub-study and analyses of structural and process factors will explore opportunities for further refinement and tailoring of the intervention.

DISCUSSION: This pragmatic trial will inform implementation of guidelines across a range of oncology and palliative care outpatient service contexts. If found effective, the implementation strategies will be made freely available on the Wiki alongside the guidelines.
Language eng
DOI 10.1186/s12913-018-3318-0
Field of Research 1117 Public Health And Health Services
0807 Library And Information Studies
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2018, The Authors
Free to Read? Yes
Use Rights Creative Commons Attribution licence
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30111742

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Health and Social Development
Open Access Collection
Related Links
Link Description
Connect to Elements publication management system
Go to link with your DU access privileges
 
Connect to published version (open access)
Go to link with your DU access privileges
 
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 8 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 8 times in Scopus Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 318 Abstract Views, 84 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 27 Jul 2018, 08:49:49 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.