The feasibility of a Pet Support Program in an Australian university setting

Cooke, Emily, Henderson-Wilson, Claire and Warner, Elyse 2020, The feasibility of a Pet Support Program in an Australian university setting, Health Promotion Journal of Australia, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1002/hpja.411.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The feasibility of a Pet Support Program in an Australian university setting
Author(s) Cooke, Emily
Henderson-Wilson, ClaireORCID iD for Henderson-Wilson, Claire orcid.org/0000-0001-7826-9788
Warner, ElyseORCID iD for Warner, Elyse orcid.org/0000-0002-1759-2183
Journal name Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Article ID hpja.411
Start page 1
End page 11
Total pages 11
Publisher Wiley
Place of publication Hoboken, NJ
Publication date 2020-08-31
ISSN 1036-1073
2201-1617
Keyword(s) Australia
animal assisted therapy
health promotion
universities
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
animal-assisted therapy
ANIMAL-ASSISTED ACTIVITIES
COLLEGE-STUDENTS
THERAPY DOGS
HEALTH
DEPRESSION
STRESS
Summary Issue addressed: Internationally, universities have recognised the benefits of Pet Support Programs (PSPs). However, existing literature has predominately focused on quantitatively measuring health outcomes associated with a PSP amongst student populations. This research aimed to explore the feasibility of a PSP within an Australian university, as there is a need to explore practical considerations involved in implementation.Methods: This research used a qualitative descriptive approach. Participants were recruited via purposive snowball sampling. The sample included 17 participants across eight administrative divisions within an Australian university. Semi‐structured individual interviews were used to collect data. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.Results: Three main themes emerged from the data: Organisational Change, Program Management and Perceived Outcomes. Findings suggest several considerations from both an organisational and program level that need to be addressed prior to implementation, including the university's policies, the location and animal welfare. The main perceived outcomes were stress relief and social support. Ways to minimise risks to those who may have an aversion towards animals were also discussed.Conclusions: Participants believed implementing a PSP would be feasible in the university setting, provided all aforementioned considerations were adequately addressed. Considerations identified have the potential to act as a barrier or a facilitator depending on how they are managed.So what?: Where feasible and later implemented, a PSP could provide Australian university students and staff with an alternative means of improving mental health, providing stress relief and contributing towards the Health Promoting University framework.
Notes In press
Language eng
DOI 10.1002/hpja.411
Indigenous content off
Field of Research 1117 Public Health and Health Services
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2020, Australian Health Promotion Association
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30143313

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 51 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 08 Oct 2020, 15:38:14 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.