Empirical Data Is Failing to Break the Ethics Stalemate in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate

Forlini, Cynthia 2020, Empirical Data Is Failing to Break the Ethics Stalemate in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate, AJOB Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 240-242, doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1830883.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Empirical Data Is Failing to Break the Ethics Stalemate in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate
Author(s) Forlini, CynthiaORCID iD for Forlini, Cynthia orcid.org/0000-0003-3809-8229
Journal name AJOB Neuroscience
Volume number 11
Issue number 4
Start page 240
End page 242
Total pages 4
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2020
ISSN 2150-7740
2150-7759
Language eng
DOI 10.1080/21507740.2020.1830883
Indigenous content off
HERDC Research category C4 Letter or note
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30145585

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Medicine
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 17 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 23 Nov 2020, 07:14:44 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.