•  Home
  • Library
  • DRO home
Submit research Contact DRO

DRO

Self-efficacy, habit strength, health locus of control and response to the personalised nutrition Food4Me intervention study

J Stewart–Knox, B, Rankin, A, P Bunting, B, J Frewer, L, Celis-Morales, C, M Livingstone, K, Fischer, ARH, Poínhos, R, Kuznesof, S, J Gibney, M and Mathers, JC 2022, Self-efficacy, habit strength, health locus of control and response to the personalised nutrition Food4Me intervention study, British Food Journal, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 314-330, doi: 10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0221.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Self-efficacy, habit strength, health locus of control and response to the personalised nutrition Food4Me intervention study
Author(s) J Stewart–Knox, B
Rankin, A
P Bunting, B
J Frewer, L
Celis-Morales, C
M Livingstone, K
Fischer, ARH
Poínhos, R
Kuznesof, S
J Gibney, M
Mathers, JC
Journal name British Food Journal
Volume number 124
Issue number 1
Start page 314
End page 330
Total pages 17
Publisher Emerald Publishing Group
Place of publication Bingley, Eng.
Publication date 2022-01-03
ISSN 0007-070X
1758-4108
Keyword(s) Agricultural Economics & Policy
Agriculture
BEHAVIOR
CONSUMPTION
CONTROL BELIEFS
Food Science & Technology
FRUIT
Habit strength
Health locus of control
Healthy eating index
IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS
INDEX
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Mediterranean diet
METAANALYSIS
QUALITY
Science & Technology
Self-efficacy
SOCIAL SUPPORT
Summary PurposeRandomised controlled trials identify causal links between variables but not why an outcome has occurred. This analysis sought to determine how psychological factors assessed at baseline influenced response to personalised nutrition.Design/methodology/approachWeb-based, randomised, controlled trial (RCT) was conducted across seven European countries. Volunteers, both male and female, aged over 18 years were randomised to either a non-personalised (control) or a personalised (treatment) dietary advice condition. Linear mixed model analysis with fixed effects was used to compare associations between internal and external health locus of control (HLoC), nutrition self-efficacy (NS-E) and self-report habit index (S-RHI) at baseline (N = 1444), with healthy eating index (HEI) and Mediterranean diet index (MDI) scores between conditions post-intervention (N = 763).FindingsAn increase in MDI scores was observed between baseline and six months in the treatment group which was associated with higher NS-E (p < 0.001), S-RHI (p < 0.001) and external HLoC (p < 0.001). Increase in HEI between baseline and six months in the treatment group was associated with higher NS-E (p < 0.001) and external HLoC (p = 0.009). Interaction between time and condition indicated increased HEI scores (p < 0.001), which were associated with higher S-RHI scores in the treatment than control group (p = 0.032). Internal HLoC had no effect on MDI or HEI.Originality/valuePsychological factors associated with behaviour change need consideration when tailoring dietary advice. Those with weaker habit strength will require communication focussed upon establishing dietary habits and support in integrating advised changes into daily routine. Information on habit strength can also be used to inform how progress towards dietary goals is monitored and fed back to the individual. Those with stronger habit strength are more likely to benefit from personalised nutrition.
Language eng
DOI 10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0221
Indigenous content off
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30153588

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Faculty of Health
Related Links
Link Description
Connect to Elements publication management system
Go to link with your DU access privileges
 
Connect to published version
Go to link with your DU access privileges
 
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 15 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 16 Jul 2021, 08:16:24 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.