Assessing soft sediment biodiversity associated with shellfish reefs using eDNA & morphological sampling methods

Beever, Stephen 2021, Assessing soft sediment biodiversity associated with shellfish reefs using eDNA & morphological sampling methods, B. Environmental Science (Hons) thesis, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Assessing soft sediment biodiversity associated with shellfish reefs using eDNA & morphological sampling methods
Author Beever, Stephen
Institution Deakin University
School School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Faculty Faculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment
Degree type Honours
Degree name B. Environmental Science (Hons)
Thesis advisor Matthews TyORCID iD for Matthews Ty orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-5433
Date submitted 2021
Keyword(s) marine soft sediment assemblages
eDNA
morphological identification
marine ecology
shellfish reefs
Summary Shellfish reefs face enormous threats from anthropogenic impacts. Globally, an estimated 85% of reefs have been lost, primarily through overfishing, disease and parasitism. Port Philip Bay, Victoria has been the site of recent reef reconstruction (2017 & 2018) by The Nature Conservancy. However, much of the post-reef monitoring has focused on pelagic and epibenthic organisms rather than soft sediment assemblages. A current knowledge gap is whether restored reefs influence nearby soft-sediment assemblages via the supply of organic matter (i.e. ‘reef spill over’). The current study aims to assesses whether soft-sediment assemblages directly adjacent to restored reefs differ from nearby non-reef sediment. Traditional morphological sorting and modern eDNA metabarcoding methods were used to test this aim. Two restored reef types consisting of mussels (Mytilus edulis planulatus) and mud oysters (Ostrea angasi), together with three control sites (non-reef, bare sediment) were sampled. These methods, using presence/absence data, revealed no significant differences in soft-sediment assemblages among reef types or controls. However, abundance data associated with the traditional morphological sorting detected significant site-to-site variability, which was associated with differences at one of the control sites, 9ft bank. Methods were significantly different in terms of unique taxa identified. Polychaetes were the most diverse taxa, with seventeen unique families revealed across the three habitat types. Nemerteans (ribbon worms) were the most abundant taxon at mussel and oyster reef sites, whereas Syllidae (Polychaeta) was the most abundant taxon at control sites. These results suggest that the recently restored reefs are yet to influence adjacent soft-sediment assemblages, and will provide important baseline data for future monitoring efforts. The restoration of these reefs is still at an early stage, so further reef monitoring will be important for assessing future change.
Language eng
Indigenous content off
Field of Research 3103 Marine and Estuarine Ecology
Description of original 49 p.
Copyright notice ©All rights reserved
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30154701

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 7 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 20 Aug 2021, 09:57:44 EST by Bernadette Admin Houghton

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.