•  Home
  • Library
  • DRO home
Submit research Contact DRO

DRO

Openly accessible

The effectiveness of web-based technology platforms in facilitating construction project collaboration: A qualitative analysis of 1,152 user reviews

Chowdhury, Morshed, Hosseini, MR, Martek, Igor, Edwards, DJ and Wang, Jiangting 2021, The effectiveness of web-based technology platforms in facilitating construction project collaboration: A qualitative analysis of 1,152 user reviews, Journal of Information Technology in Construction, vol. 26, pp. 953-973, doi: 10.36680/J.ITCON.2021.051.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The effectiveness of web-based technology platforms in facilitating construction project collaboration: A qualitative analysis of 1,152 user reviews
Author(s) Chowdhury, MorshedORCID iD for Chowdhury, Morshed orcid.org/0000-0002-2866-4955
Hosseini, MR
Martek, IgorORCID iD for Martek, Igor orcid.org/0000-0001-6573-1291
Edwards, DJ
Wang, JiangtingORCID iD for Wang, Jiangting orcid.org/0000-0002-8171-6291
Journal name Journal of Information Technology in Construction
Volume number 26
Start page 953
End page 973
Total pages 21
Publisher International Council Research & Innovation Building and Construction
Place of publication Stockholm, Sweden
Publication date 2021
ISSN 1874-4753
1874-4753
Keyword(s) Collaboration technology
construction
Engineering
Engineering, Civil
ENVIRONMENT
NETWORKS
Science & Technology
sentiment analysis
SYSTEMS
Technology
text mining
web-based collaboration tools
Summary The construction industry accounts for 9% of global GDP. Efforts at addressing construction’s inherent inefficiencies have over the last decade increasingly involved the deployment of web-based collaborative tools. Consequently, much research has been devoted to assessing these platforms; including interoperability, workflow management and technological limits. What has not been considered to date are the views of web-based tool users themselves as to the functionality, potency and usability of the various platforms available on the market. Currently, there are 5,300,000 documented users of web-based collaborative tools. If web-based collaboration is to be further enhanced, the views of users must be known. This study explores this dimension. Financeonline’s top six tools were considered: CoCostruct, PlanGrid, Autodesk BIM 360, Procore, e-builder and Aconex. Around 200 reviews for each tool were collected from ‘Business Software Reviews from Software Advice,’ resulting in a total dataset of 1,152 complete reviews. Text-mining analysis was applied to this dataset, using RapidMiner Studio 7.5. Thirty key terms with a frequency of over 100 occurrences were retrieved; terms such as software, manage, inform, support, easy use, function, track and friendly. These constitute the subject of the reviews. These terms were then analyzed for sentiment qualifiers; either positive or negative. A total of 804 sentiments were positive, 322 negative and 26 neutral. This study thus highlights that while 70% of user reviews of web-based collaborative tools are positive, there remains much room for improvement. Areas for improvement are also indicated by this study.
Language eng
DOI 10.36680/J.ITCON.2021.051
Field of Research 0899 Other Information and Computing Sciences
0905 Civil Engineering
1202 Building
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Free to Read? Yes
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30159311

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment
School of Information Technology
Open Access Collection
Related Links
Link Description
Link to full-text (open access)  
Connect to Elements publication management system
Go to link with your DU access privileges
 
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 63 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 24 Nov 2021, 15:00:53 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.