The Bear and the Dragon Pragmatism and State-centric International Law in the un Security Council
Paige, Tamsin 2021, The Bear and the Dragon Pragmatism and State-centric International Law in the un Security Council, Nordic Journal of International Law, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 446-470, doi: 10.1163/15718107-90040006.
Attached Files
Name
Description
MIMEType
Size
Downloads
Title
The Bear and the Dragon Pragmatism and State-centric International Law in the un Security Council
AbstractWithin the ideological confines of Western liberal democracies, two ‘truths’ are held to be self-evident: that Russia and China are opportunistic in their behaviour, and that this behaviour is strategic rather than sincere. This article is a short, empirical analysis of the justifications of Russia and China when determining a ‘threat to the peace’ in accordance with Article 39 of the Charter of the United Nations. Examining how Russia and China have justified their decisions where this concept was significantly under debate, I find that their behaviour is not as opportunistic as believed. Rather, it is consistent with ideals of pragmatism and state-centric interpretations of international law. I further suggest that the consistency of their approaches means it is of little consequence if their arguments are strategic in nature.
Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.