•  Home
  • Library
  • DRO home
Submit research Contact DRO

DRO

Openly accessible

To drive or not to drive? A qualitative comparison of car ownership and transport experiences in London and Singapore

Chng, S, Abraham, Charles, White, MP and Skippon, S 2019, To drive or not to drive? A qualitative comparison of car ownership and transport experiences in London and Singapore, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 2, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2019.100030.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title To drive or not to drive? A qualitative comparison of car ownership and transport experiences in London and Singapore
Author(s) Chng, S
Abraham, Charles
White, MP
Skippon, S
Journal name Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Volume number 2
Article ID 100030
Start page 1
End page 11
Total pages 11
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2019-09-01
ISSN 2590-1982
2590-1982
Keyword(s) Transport experience
Transport policy
Car ownership
Qualitative comparison
London
Singapore
Summary Cities are responding to their growing transportation demands in different ways. We interviewed city dwellers in two cities, Singapore and London, with highly developed transport infrastructure to understand individual transport decisions and experiences in the context of two different city cultures that support distinct transport policies. Compared to London, cars and other private transport are valued and priced beyond the reach of most in Singapore. Seventeen adults from London and sixteen from Singapore were interviewed and presented with an overview of the other city's transportation system to elicit their opinions on the differences and whether an alternate system could be applied in their city. Differences were observed in perceptions of, and beliefs concerning, private transport. In Singapore, cars served more than utilitarian purposes and were viewed as socially desirable status and success symbols. In London, car ownership and usage were viewed as a necessity due to a perceived lack of accessible, alternative transport.Both samples valued accessibility, affordability and comfort in relation to transport mode choice. There was also general acknowledgement and support for managing the car population and use in both cities, though how it should be done remains highly context-specific. Our findings suggest that public engagement and effective communication are important components when interventions and policies are introduced to better manage the car population and use in cities.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2019.100030
Indigenous content off
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Free to Read? Yes
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30161512

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Psychology
Open Access Collection
Related Links
Link Description
Connect to Elements publication management system
Go to link with your DU access privileges
 
Link to full-text (open access)  
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 8 times in Scopus Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 21 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 17 Jan 2022, 09:56:36 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.