•  Home
  • Library
  • DRO home
Submit research Contact DRO

DRO

Evaluating the capabilities model of dementia care: A non-randomized controlled trial exploring resident quality of life and care staff attitudes and experiences

Moyle, W, Venturato, L, Cooke, M, Murfield, Jenny, Griffiths, S, Hughes, J and Wolf, N 2016, Evaluating the capabilities model of dementia care: A non-randomized controlled trial exploring resident quality of life and care staff attitudes and experiences, International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1091-1100, doi: 10.1017/S1041610216000296.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Evaluating the capabilities model of dementia care: A non-randomized controlled trial exploring resident quality of life and care staff attitudes and experiences
Author(s) Moyle, W
Venturato, L
Cooke, M
Murfield, Jenny
Griffiths, S
Hughes, J
Wolf, N
Journal name International Psychogeriatrics
Volume number 28
Issue number 7
Start page 1091
End page 1100
Total pages 10
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2016
ISSN 1041-6102
1741-203X
Keyword(s) dementia
FAMILY
Geriatrics & Gerontology
Gerontology
INTERVENTION
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
long-term care
LONG-TERM-CARE
nursing care management
nursing models
OLDER-PEOPLE
PERSON-CENTERED CARE
Psychiatry
Psychology
Psychology, Clinical
quality of life
quantitative evaluation
SATISFACTION
Science & Technology
SELF-REPORT
Social Sciences
work satisfaction
Summary ABSTRACTBackground:This 12 month, Australian study sought to compare the Capabilities Model of Dementia Care (CMDC) with usual long-term care (LTC), in terms of (1) the effectiveness of the CMDC in assisting care staff to improve Quality Of Life (QOL) for older people with dementia; and (2) whether implementation of the CMDC improved staff attitudes towards, and experiences of working and caring for the person with dementia.Methods:A single blind, non-randomized controlled trial design, involving CMDC intervention group (three facilities) and a comparison usual LTC practice control group (one facility), was conducted from August 2010 to September 2011. Eighty-one staff members and 48 family members of a person with dementia were recruited from these four LTC facilities. At baseline, 6 and 12 months, staff completed a modified Staff Experiences of Working with Demented Residents questionnaire (SEWDR), and families completed the Quality of Life – Alzheimer's Disease questionnaire (QOL-AD).Results:LTC staff in the usual care group reported significantly lower SEWDR scores (i.e. less work satisfaction) than those in the CMDC intervention group at 12 months (p = 0.005). Similarly, family members in the comparison group reported significantly lower levels of perceived QOL for their relative with dementia (QOL-AD scores) than their counterparts in the CMDC intervention group at 12 months (p = 0.012).Conclusions:Although the study has a number of limitations the CMDC appears to be an effective model of dementia care – more so than usual LTC practice. The CMDC requires further evaluation with participants from a diverse range of LTC facilities and stages of cognitive impairment.
Language eng
DOI 10.1017/S1041610216000296
Field of Research 110399 Clinical Sciences not elsewhere classified
11 Medical and Health Sciences
17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30161900

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Medicine
Related Links
Link Description
Connect to published version
Go to link with your DU access privileges
 
Connect to Elements publication management system
Go to link with your DU access privileges
 
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 4 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 4 times in Scopus Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 8 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 24 Jan 2022, 07:15:47 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.